requestId:68499ac64c3634.87905990.
The beginning of modern new mind–with Liang Shuming, Xiong Shili, and Jin Lin as the middle
Author: Chen Yu (Teacher of the Department of Philosophy, Capital Master Fan, PhD Instructor)
Source: “History of Chinese Philosophy”, 2019 Issue 03
Time: Confucius was in the 2570th year of the sixth month of Jihai, Guimao
href=”https://sites.google.com/view/sugardaddy-coding”>Integration Contract, analyze the academic form of arguments and ideology, receive East and East philosophy resources, strive to transform the creative nature of Confucian learning traditions, and respond to the wise and materialized civilized life in the East. Liang Shuming, Xiong Shili and Jin Lin all completed this mission from a different perspective at the level of disagreement. The most representative and complete contributions of Xiong Shili Philosophy, which completed the modern reconstruction of the philosophy of mind and mind, and at the same time, Su embodies the idea of the original response to Oriental philosophical civilization, that is, by reconstructing a full intrinsic theory, it proves that the life of Chinese civilization is self-sufficient in its origin, and thus lays the foundation for the development of the next stage of modern new mind.
The study of mind mentioned in this article is not the study of mind as the main subject, but the study of mind as the main body. This study of mind was represented by King of Ru in the Song and Ming dynasties, and in modern times, there were Liang Shuming, Xiong Shili and others. Among modern philosophers, Rong Youlan discussed the differences between Cheng Zhu’s theory and King Zhu’s heart from the perspective of the subject. He said: “Ordinary people who discuss Zhu Xi’s differences mostly say that Zhu Xi focuses on Taoism and Xiangshan emphasizes respect for virtue. These words were already available at that time. However, Zhu Xi’s ultimate goal is to understand the overall use of my heart. … After all, whether the differences between Zhu Xi’s differences lies in the differences in learning or cultivation methods he talks about is a very important problem.”[1]HeTaiwan Baocai Network clearly pointed out that the most basic difference between Zhu Lu lies in metaphysics: Zhu Xi congratulated the “nature is reason” as Cheng Shu said, and the answer of the Jiuqing Zhuang was “mind is reason”. The two sentences are only one word different, but there are some basic differences between the two schools. We saw in Zhu Xi’s system that mind is the concreteization of principles and the concreteization of atmosphere, so mind and abstract principles are not the same. For Zhu Xi, he could only say that nature is reason, but he could not say that the mind is reason. …In Zhu Xi’s view, there are actually two worlds, one is abstract and the other is concrete. In the eyes of the Jiuqingzi, in fact, there is only one world, it is the heart (personal heart) or “heart” (universe heart). [2]
In short, the difference between Zhu Lu is “two worlds” and “one world”In terms of world”, Zhu Xi admitted that there was a metaphysical world of reason, and the mind was a concrete energy or consciousness activity; the nine purses of the earth determined that “a world”, in which the heart was the master.
Rongyoulan believed that the difference between the two doors of the Song and Ming Taoism also extended to modern Chinese philosophy. In his opinion, Jin Yuelin and Rongyoulan were representatives of the modern new science, and Liang Shuming and Xiong Shili were representatives of the modern new science. Only He was the teacher of the last century and the 1930s and 1940s, who was afraid that he would not have expected that the new Confucianism of modern Confucianism would be inherited and developed by Tang Junyi and Mou Zongsan after Xiong Shili; and the first sciences of science are difficult to say that they have a true inheritor after Youyoulan. From the perspective of the development of modern Confucianism in the 20th century, the new modern Confucianism has experienced three stages: the first stage is represented by Liang Shuming, Xiong Shili, and Jin Lin, which is an opening; search for keywords: Protagonist: Ye Qiuguan|Supporting roleBaocai.com: In the second stage, Xie Xi was represented by Tang Junyi and Mou Zongsan, and achieved a new Cen Ling; in the third stage, Du Weiming and others, the mental discussion began to develop diversifiedly. This article will give a brief discussion on the opening of modern new mind from several aspects. Due to the consideration of historical periods, it is important to focus on the development of modern new mind. We must understand Liang Shuming’s “What Civilization and Its Philosophy”, Xiong Shili’s “New Ideology” (Text Text) and Jin Lin’s “Simplified Modern Ideology” will not be in line with the development of their later thinking.
1. The establishment of the philosophical paradigm
After the 20th century, the study of traditional principles and minds The research and development mainly presents a philosophical paradigm of academicization. Needless to say, Liang Shuming and Xiong Shili also base it on this. Liang and Xiong are both professors from the Department of Philosophy in Beijing (Jing Li, Beijing Philosophy in 1912, and changed to the Department of Philosophy in 1919). Their representative works at that time also have academic influences by publicly publishing books on philosophy works. Although Liang later worked hard to build social reality in the countryside, Xiong Xiang spent time in the school, which expressed many of them being dissatisfied with the modern academic system, but they adopted the “philosophical” form in their thinking and verbal methods. Here, at most, there are the following aspects worth noting.
First is the division between religion, philosophy, and science: religion can include academic questions, but it is ultimately not academic questions平台的文; Philosophy and science are both questions, but there is a fundamental difference between the two. Liang Shuming clearly pointed out in his early years that philosophy is about knowledge: “If Buddhism is studied as philosophy and practices, it will eliminate its original meaning. The original intention was not to think about philosophy, but it was actually destroyed by philosophy. …In prophecy, what philosophy is about knowledge, and what Buddhism is about knowledge is about death. “[3] Buddhism should go beyond knowledge, and philosophy is to establish knowledge through the tree. Liang Shuming believed that religion can include knowledge and thinking, but it ultimately needs to form a certain life attitude, and philosophy is “systematic thinking”, “the beginning and end are united in one’s own words”, which includes metaphysical, cognitive theory and philosophy of life. (“Liang Shuming’s Selected Collection” Volume 1, Page 395) The focus of philosophy is metaphysical, traditional Chinese Long-term cultivationScience is a metaphysics, with the most basic distinction between science: “What metaphysics talk about is nothing different from science. What science talks about is a multi- and fixed phenomenon, while what metaphysics talks about is a one-to-one change and one-one body. “(“Liang Shuming’s Selected Works” Volume 1, Page 359) Traditionally, we should express this “change style”, “Everything that comes out is relative, dual, moderate, balanced, and harmonious. All existence is like this. ” (Ibid., page 444) Therefore, the expression characteristics of traditional metaphysics often appear as “unexpressed”.
Xiong Shili also has a clear distinction between religion, philosophy and science. He said: “Confucius said that philosophy is so excited, religion becomes the past, which is very true; as for science is so excited, philosophy becomes the past, which is unreasonable. Regarding the investigation of the body, it is a matter of academic research, but no religion can be considered. This cannot be explained in a bit. The original theory is not religious, and science cannot take over this land. ”[4] The form of short-term learning for religious elders and short-term learning, while science and philosophy are two different learning questions:
Study questions are divided into two ways: science and philosophy. (That is, metaphysics.) Science is the most basic one that is developed from practice, in other words, that is, from the experience of daily life. What science is developed through development is wisdom. This wisdom is only from daily experience彩彩票彩票网彩票网彩票网彩票网站票网站票网站票网站票网站票网站票网站票网站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站站� href=”https://sites.google.com/view/sugargirl-story-share”>Baobao.com]
Liang and Xiong both divided philosophy and religious areas to express their viewpoint and sentimentality in philosophy as a kind of objectivity and sentimentality in philosophy.
The second is the use of theoret
發佈留言